« Thousands of Public Schools, Teachers, and Students Left Behind | Main | RFK Jr. speaks here Monday June 13 »
June 10, 2005
Patiot Act Hearing Shut Down House by Judiciary Chair
Note that hearings can only be shut down by unanimous consent, but Chairman Sensenbrenner ignored that point of order. His actions against minority members in the House exercising their legitimate right to a hold a hearing under Rule 11, was an unprecedented breach of House rules.
Watch the video here.
From DemBloggers:
This morning Rep. Sensenbrenner, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee was leading a committee hearing looking into the renewal of Patriot Act.Mr. Sensenbrenner decided that he didn't like the tone of the meeting and simply got up and left but not before he criticized the witnesses who came and gave their testimony to the committee.
After he left the microphones were switched on and off while the Democratic members of the committee continued to discuss the renewal of the Patriot Act.
From BuzzFlash :
GOP House Judiciary Chair Uses Pinochet Tactics to Abruptly and Unilaterally Shut Down Hearing Into Abuses of the (Un)Patriot Act, Because He Was Afraid the Truth Would Come Out. America: "IT" is Happening Here. Democracy is Being Dismantled by GOP Thugs.
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSISThis morning, House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-WI) unilaterally and arbitrarily shut down committee hearings on the reauthorization of the Patriot Act without comment or issuing a statement. Sensenbrenner gaveled the committee hearings in the middle of witnesses testifying about human and civil rights abuses at Guantanamo Bay, racial profiling of individuals of Middle Eastern descent, prolonged detentions of Americans after September 11th and other abuses.
The suppression of free speech and testimony in the congressional committee in charge of protecting our civil liberties shows the Republican’s power grab has no limits and no decency. The irony was not lost on anyone.
The witnesses appearing before the House Judiciary Committee included, Chip Pitts, Chair of the Board of Amnesty International USA; Dr. James J. Zogby, President of the Arab American Institute; Deborah Pearlstein, Director of the U.S. Law and Security Program “Human Rights First”; and Carlina Tapia Ruano of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
The witnesses were called by the indomitable Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) who continues to stand up to the right-wing’s attempt to eviscerate American Constitutional liberties.
“There are few issues that are more important to this Committee or this Congress than the Patriot Act and the war against terror. This not only affects the rights and privacy of every American, but impacts the extent to which our nation is able to hold itself out as a beacon of liberty as we advocate for democracy around the world,” said Congressman Conyers as he opened the committee hearings.
Sixteen provisions in the USA Patriot Act are expiring because Rep. Conyers fought for sunset provisions to keep the erosion of civil liberties from becoming permanent when the Patriot Act was first introduced in the fervor following September 11th. Now the Bush administration is seeking to not only reauthorize but expand the reach and power of the Patriot Act, such as giving the FBI the ability to issue secret wire taps and conduct searches without warrants approved by a federal judge. A policy tantamount to creating a secret police force above the rule of law.
“Rather than making us safer, the abuses and excesses of our war against terrorism are actually tarnishing our nation's reputation and making us less safe,” said Conyers.
Chip Pitts of Amnesty International USA in his written statement to be addressed to the House Judiciary Committee – before Sensenbrenner effectively muzzled him and other witnesses – observed that the Patriot Act has a “chilling affect on freedom.” Pitts added “the law jeopardizes due process and fair trial procedures by encouraging a presumption of guilt until proven innocent. …The Patriot Act is of concern both in itself, and also because it has inspired a significant cascade of similar legislation around the world that weakens the rule of law which is so essential to the protection of human rights.”
The overarching fear with expanding the Patriot Act is the lack of oversight given to judges, the denial of due process to American citizens such as keeping detainees from the right to see a lawyer, and the broad discretion given to police and homeland security officials in the Bush administration. You can be labeled a suspected terrorist, if not presumed guilty, if the Bush administration says you are. The secretive Busheviks appear more interested in obtaining Stalin-like police powers than in protecting Americans from terrorism.
Sensenbrenner's Soviet-style tactic of gaveling a meeting to end it because he didnt like what he heard about the Bushevik abuses of our civil liberties is a horrifying example of what America faces if the GOP one-party state is given expanded police powers to invade the rights of Americans.
“The governments that are most effective in safeguarding human security are those that operate strictly under the rule of law: that is, under a system in which people are governed by public laws that are set in advance, applied equally in all cases,” said Deborah Pearlstein, Director, U.S. Law and Security Program who was called to testify.
The Bush administration has routinely flouted the rule of law since September 11th claiming the need for broad police powers to protect security and prevent terrorism. But the Bush administration as well as Department of Justice and Homeland Security officials have been routinely discredited and rebuked for their actions. They have repeatedly initiated arrests and invasions of privacy for public relations purposes, only to drop charges later.
In short, many Americans and organizations just don’t trust the Bush administration, and rightly so after a systematic pattern of abuse and erosion of the Constitution. The Busheviks are clearly using the fear of terrorism as a means to consolidate dictatorship like powers.
What member of Congress in their right mind could possibly consider giving more power to an Administration that endorses torture and indefinite detentions?
Democracies do not fail overnight. They slowly erode and descend by denying rights to the minority, the takeover of an independent judiciary, suppressing speech and assembly, and the rise of secrecy and repressive police powers in the executive branch.
Sensenbrenner’s belligerent act to shut down dissent and gag witnesses warning about the broad police powers given to the administration should give Americans pause as the Republican Party inches closer and closer to turning American into a one-party state.The witnesses to the Bushevik violations of our Constitution, civil liberties, and individual rights valiantly continued to speak after Sensenbrenner formally shut down the hearing (probably as a result of a phone call from the White House). But their voices were hardly heard, which was the objective of the Busheviks.
What makes the barbarians in the White House shudder most is a bright light of truth reaching the American public.
They have been unusually successful in intimidating the media into enabling their lies. Now, they are just preemptively breaking laws and the rules of Congress to suppress the truth.
It can happen here, and it is.
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
Posted by Lyn Wall at June 10, 2005 04:17 PM | Permalink
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.houstondemocrats.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/304
Comments
The GOP ended the week losing their minds.
Sensenbrenner also wrote a note to Chairman Dean after he watched the good doctor slice him and dice him on "Today" this morning -- I didn't see this; just read the accounts -- calling Dean "delusional" and in the same paragraph asked him to refrain from personal attacks. (!)
Yesterday a FOX News reporter named Brian Wilson went nuts in Harry Reid's office, screaming questions out of turn, and when someone asked him who he was (he wasn't wearing his Capitol credentials) retorted "Who the f*** are YOU?"
I suppose considering the week they had -- with Bush's poll numbers hitting a new low, the Coingate scandal bubbling over, and five more Marines killed just today by the so-called weakening insurgency in Iraq -- they have every right to be a little upset...
Posted by: PDiddie at June 10, 2005 04:51 PM
Next week will be even worse. John Conyers - johnconyers.com - has over 450,000 signatures on his letter requesting an explanation of the Downing Street Minutes from Bush. (Hurry over to johnconyers.com and try to be number 500,000.) He will deliver the letter personally to the White House on Thursday and hold hearings that same day that will feature documentation supporting the claims in the DSM. More at Raw Story.
Posted by: Lyn Wall at June 10, 2005 05:00 PM
I hope all of those people who last week were so concerned about our being civil in these little blog discourses are reading about Sensenbrenner's arrogant display of Repug fascist behavior on Friday and about Harry Reid's restraint with the Fox reporter. Reid should have given that bastard a good kick in the slats to teach him some manners and then thrown him out on his behind and told him to go look for his mama under the porch.
Sensenbrenner is a much more serious problem. Sheila Jackson Lee was at the White Hat reception for Democratic members of the Lege on Friday night, and she was mightily upset about the way the day had gone in Washington. While we decide what else to do, I think we should get on the horn and let her know we're behind her and the other Dems on the Judiciary Committee who tried to go on with the hearings but couldn't. As Lyn Wall pointed out on Friday night, Sensenbrenner's nasty behavior and walkout were assaults on the democratic process--indeed, on Democracy itself--and, as Howard Dean, God bless him, will no doubt rightly point out, something is going to have to be done. He has at least intimated that the Repugs can't stand the truth, and yesterday bears out that claim. I don't think it matters a tinker's damn (dam?)whether what the witnesses were saying was exactly on the mark in the Patriot Act or not. When the government won't let the opposition speak, then the opposition damn well better take every opportunity that comes along to get its message out. Besides, Repug "outrage" comes across as about as genuine as the proverbial three-dollar bill, and it doesn't sit very well on Sensenbrenner, that old fraud.
Posted by: Muriel Stubbs at June 11, 2005 03:19 PM