« ACLU Releases More FOIA Documents | Main | WHDC Member Ben Ongoco Featured in Houston Chronicle »
May 27, 2005
The Pro-Death Bush Administration
There are so many Bushisms to pick from that prove the Adminstration really promotes a culture of Death. Here's one about war:
I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace. George W. Bush
William Saleton of Salon points out that The Administration's statements on the potentially life saving Stem Cell issue directly contradict their statements on the death penalty.
This Administration is Pro-Death and we need to call them on it.
STEM CELLS DEATH PENALTY"Yet the ethics of medicine are not infinitely adaptable. There is at least one bright line: We do not end some lives for the medical benefit of others."
—George W. Bush, New York Times, Aug. 12, 2001
"During the course of the campaign in 1994 I was asked, 'Do you support the death penalty?' I said I did, if administered fairly and justly. Because I believe it saves lives."
—Bush, Oct. 17, 2000
"Dr. Zerhouni shares my view that human life is precious, and should not be exploited or destroyed for the benefits of others."
—Bush, March 22, 2002White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer: "The president believes that we need to welcome and create a culture that respects life in this country."
Q: "How can he be in favor of showing how much we disapprove of killing, by killing?"
Fleischer: "You're referring to the death penalty?"
Q: "I'm referring to the death penalty."
Fleischer: "Because the president's opinion is the death penalty ultimately saves lives."
"Research cloning would contradict the most fundamental principle of medical ethics, that no human life should be exploited or extinguished for the benefit of another."
—Bush, April 10, 2002
"The president supports the death penalty for those people who commit violent, heinous crimes, because he believes that it saves lives."
—Fleischer, June 20, 2002
"In this session, the U.N. will consider a resolution sponsored by Costa Rica calling for a comprehensive ban on human cloning. I support that resolution and urge all governments to affirm a basic ethical principle: No human life should ever be produced or destroyed for the benefit of another."
—Bush, Sept. 21, 2004
"The president does believe that the death penalty does serve as a deterrent to crime. He believes that for violent and heinous crimes, that the death penalty ultimately saves lives."
—Fleischer, Jan. 13, 2003
"To build a culture of life, we must also ensure that scientific advances always serve human dignity, not take advantage of some lives for the benefit of others."
—Bush, Feb. 2, 2005
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan: "Well, I can tell you why the president supports the death penalty. He's made that clear before. That the president believes it's a deterrent that helps save lives, and that's why he supports the death penalty."
Q: "But isn't that inconsistent with what he's doing today?"
McClellan: "The reason he supports the death penalty is because it helps—he believes that it helps save lives, and he's stated that view clearly and consistently over a number of years."
"The President is committed to medical research that does not violate the dignity of human life or exploit one human life for the benefit of another."
—White House fact sheet, State of the Union, Feb. 2, 2005
"I happen to believe that the death penalty, when properly applied, saves lives of others. And so I'm comfortable with my beliefs that there's no contradiction between the two."
—Bush, April 14, 2005
"The use of federal money, taxpayers' money to promote science which destroys life in order to save life is—I'm against that. And therefore, if the bill does that, I will veto it."
—Bush, May 20, 2005
Posted by Lyn Wall at May 27, 2005 08:58 AM | Permalink
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.houstondemocrats.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/257
Comments
Wow, these are some excellent examples of double-talk from Bush. Do you think he might have a case of flipflopitis, or maybe a heavy dose of schizophrenia? Of couse he may suffer from both.
Great post.
Posted by: Marc Olivier at May 27, 2005 07:55 PM
"Schizophrenia" is the perfect term for the Republicans' position on "the culture of life." That's why I like Jim Wallis's (God's Politics) framing of the progressive position as "a consistent ethic of life." Our side believes in reducing unwanted pregnancies so that abortions are rarely needed, in prenatal and postnatal care that saves millions of babies' lives, in universal healthcare that ensures productive lives for all age groups, in resolving conflicts without war, and in deterring crime without the death penalty. Which side has "a consistent ethic of life"? The Dems do!
Posted by: mreed
at May 29, 2005 12:47 PM